A comparison of two NiTi rotary systems, ProTaper Next and Silk for root canal cleaning ability (An in vitro study)

---

Original Article

Author Details : Padmini Chandrasekhar, Roshan U. Shetty, Twisha Adlakha, Sonali Shende, Rajesh Podar

Volume : 1, Issue : 1, Year : 2016

Article Page : 22-24

Suggest article by email

Get Permission

---

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and compare the cleaning efficacy of teeth instrumented with ProTaper Next and Silk File Systems.
Materials and Methods: Forty permanent mandibular premolar teeth with single canal were selected. ProTaper Next file system was used to prepare the root canals of group one comprising of twenty samples, and the Silk file system was used to shape the root canals of group two. After cleaning and shaping, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally. The debris score evaluation with a stereomicroscope (30 x magnifications) preceded the statistical analysis with ANOVA and Student-t tests.
Results: No statistically significant difference seen between the two experimental groups (Protaper Next and Silk) concerning the debris in the apical, middle and coronal thirds of root canals.
Conclusions: Rotary Systems (ProTaper next and Silk) showed acceptable cleaning ability in permanent Root Canals.

Keywords: Root canal preparation, debris, NiTi rotary file systems

 

How to cite : Chandrasekhar P, Shetty R U, Adlakha T, Shende S, Podar R, A comparison of two NiTi rotary systems, ProTaper Next and Silk for root canal cleaning ability (An in vitro study). IP Indian J Conserv Endod 2016;1(1):22-24

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.