Get Permission Gupta, Gupta, Gupta, Khairwa, and Rana: Customized esthetic restoration in endodontically treated young permanent 1st molar


Introduction

Dental caries is one of the most widespread medical conditions both in adults and children.1 According to WHO, more than 530 million children suffer from dental caries.2 First permanent molar (FPM) is considered as most important tooth for dentition and dental development with a key role in occlusion. It participates in maxillary growth and physiology of mandibular system. However, it is considered to be most and earliest affected tooth by cavities. Indeed, early time of its eruption when hygiene is difficult and poorly controlled makes it particularly vulnerable for carious disease. 3

Treatment of carious permanent molars has always been a challenge for clinician. Various materials have been used over years such as amalgam, composites, and stainless-steel crowns (SSC) to restore such teeth with varying success rates. 1

Over the past 70 years, SSCs have been placed on primary and permanent molars to restore teeth with multi surface caries, in patients with high caries risk, after pulp therapy, restore teeth with developmental defects, teeth that are brittle and prone to fracture. For more than half century, SSCs have outperformed other materials like amalgam and composite in terms of durability and longevity. In past, no restorative material has been able to offer advantages of low cost, durability, and reliability when interim full‑coronal coverage is required.4, 5 In spite of these benefits, notable pitfall to the SSC is compromised esthetics, due to metallic appearance which has been poorly received by patients, parents, and practioners alike.4 One of biggest disadvantage of preformed SSC of 1st permanent molars is that they are supposed to be replaced after the occlusion has stabilized/settled from mixed to permanent dentition because they interfere with eruption of adjacent tooth but customized restoration is a long term solution, which doesn’t need to be changed both esthetically and functionally.

The increasing demand from parents for esthetic restorations led to the introduction of customized zirconia crowns. Zirconia crowns are recently been used in permanent 1st molar. Zirconia crowns are introduced as new full‑coverage restoration which combines excellent esthetics with superior mechanical properties. 6

Customized zirconia crowns are possible because of CAD/CAM (Computer-aided design and manufacturing) technology. Technology had a major impact on the practice of dentistry. It has changed the way the dental office communicates with patients, keeps their records, and controls its finances, as well as the way the patient receives treatment. Digital technologies now have applications in orthodontics, prosthodontics, and restorative dentistry. 7

Here we present a case with conservative approach for the management of grossly decayed young permanent molar followed by fabrication of customized zirconia restoration using digital CEREC workflow in order to restore its form function and occlusion.

Case Report

A 10-year-old boy came to clinic with decayed tooth and pain in mandibular left and right permanent back region. A medical, as well as clinical history, was taken along with the radiographic examination, which showed the presence of deep dentinal caries with pulpal exposure and extensive loss of tooth structure in the right and left young permanent mandibular 1st molar. The tooth was found to be tender on percussion. (Figure 1)

Figure 1

Pre-operative OPG

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/eacc8714-5980-4d05-a9f4-7b3afa68f889image1.png

Looking at the intraoral condition of the tooth endodontic treatment of right and left mandibular 1st molar was planned. Patient and parents were explained about the treatment.

After administering local anaesthesia single visit root canal treatment (RCT) was performed on right and left young permanent 1st molar. Access was achieved using a round diamond bur. Orifices were located and working length was established. A 5.25% solution of sodium hypochlorite and 17% was used as irrigants at every change of instrument. The apical preparation was done. Calcium hydroxide was placed as an intracanal medicament and obturation done using RH Fill sealer.(Figure 2)

Figure 2

RCT done in left and right side mandibular 1st molar

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/eacc8714-5980-4d05-a9f4-7b3afa68f889image2.png

Scanning was done by intraoral scanner (Dentsply Sirona Omnicam) after minimal tooth preparation only occlusal to capture a digital impression for further processing in CEREC software (Figure 3). A Digital record of the segment with opposing arch was also recorded. Scanning provides easier, more intuitive, and precise 3D models in natural colours in less than 2 minutes.

Figure 3

Intraoral scan

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/eacc8714-5980-4d05-a9f4-7b3afa68f889image3.png

Designing was done in 5 minutes followed by milling in the prime mill which took around 11minutes. [Figure 4a,b,c]

Figure 4

a,b,c: Customized CAD designing

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/eacc8714-5980-4d05-a9f4-7b3afa68f889image4.png

Wet milling was carried out on CAD/CAM block ( ivoclar vivadent IPSe.max ZirCAD – Yttrium- stabilized zirconium oxide block). The milling process was extremely precise, definitive and created smooth surfaces and margins compared to the lab process. This is INDIA first house latest generation CEREC Prime mill.

After milling the sprue detachment was done from the block followed by sintering and glazing. Sintering was done for strength which took around 12-15 minutes. Both sintering and glazing were simultaneously done in speed fire. Glazing was done to provide aesthetic and gloss in speed fire which took around 8-10 minutes.[Figure 5a,b]

Figure 5

a,b: Customized zirconia restoration -milling ,glazed /polished

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/eacc8714-5980-4d05-a9f4-7b3afa68f889image5.png

Fitting, aesthetics, and characterization were checked in the patient's mouth. Then, the tooth was cleaned and prepared for luting with resin modified GI cement. Excess cement was removed from interdental spaces and occlusion was checked. The patient was given post-operative instruction.[Figure 6, Figure 7]

Figure 6

Cementation with Resin modified GIC

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/eacc8714-5980-4d05-a9f4-7b3afa68f889image6.png
Figure 7

Post-operative OPG

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/eacc8714-5980-4d05-a9f4-7b3afa68f889image7.png

In a matter of less than 45 minutes, complacent, enjoyable and acceptable results were achieved. As shown in this case, we reconstituted not only the form and function of permanent teeth but also the aesthetics with minimally invasive dentistry in a single sitting with the help of the CEREC workflow

Discussion

Use of stainless-steel crowns (SSCs) in paediatric dentistry is a common practice for management of heavily decayed and deformed permanent 1st molar.8, 9 These crowns provide solution for restoration with highest success rate, without causing secondary caries and are cost effective.10 The biggest disadvantage of using SSCs is that they show aesthetically unattractive result. To overcome the poor aesthetics, new materials are developed, such as customized zirconia crowns.

Customized zirconia restoration are manufactured through CEREC workflow with help of zirconia CAD CAM block. Digital impression for restoration fabrication is done using CEREC. CEREC (Chairside Economical Restoration of Aesthetic Ceramic) is the method of manufacturing dental restorations in the dental office. The digital workflow is integrated by the intraoral scanners which take the impression. These are powerful devices that can easily send the models to the laboratory using e-mail, thus reducing expense and time. Until now this technology was used only in adults but now it’s use is extending in Paediatric Dentistry also. 11 Moreover, it involves a shorter clinical working time, less wear of the opposite dentition, and there is choice of more biocompatible material.12

Advantages of using customized digital approach is preparation of restoration is minimally invasive only occlusal preparation done is required with no labio-lingual and mesio-distal extensions. So, this restoration won’t interfere with eruption of adjacent permanent teeth and doesn’t need to be changed later with eruption of adjacent tooth. Secondly it perfectly fit on endodontically treated tooth and occlusion is achieved with no adjustments required to be done on antagonist tooth.

Various studies are done to compare the time efficiency of digital 3D scanning over conventional impression methods but only a few are done yet to compare the entire workflow.13 There is a requirement of new comparative studies in this field with introduction of latest CEREC software’s. The aim of our article was to portray the time efficiency and specificity of chairside workflow to fabricate customised hybrid restoration as per the need in young permanent molars.

A milling machine installation in clinic allows the insertion of customized final restoration within hours in single sitting after RCT (Endodontic treatment). CEREC Prime mill detains next step forward and offered a highly calibrated chairside dentistry. It manufactures extravagant chair side restoration easily and meticulously in few minutes due to the advanced digital technology.

The digital impression technique is also helpful to solve behavioural issues of the uncooperative patient as compared to the conventional impression technique. Conventional impression technique requires full mouth impression whereas, in digital impression, we need to take an impression of the particular arch /segment /quadrant we need to treat. The use of the digital intraoral impression technique eliminates the need for a conventional alginate impression. Conventional impressions are considered an unpleasant experience by some children because they cause gaging due to which impression has to be repeated to get the accurate result, thus switching to digital impression procedure have a long-term positive impact on patient perceptions of dental procedures. 14

This case report emphasises on conservative management of grossly decayed permanent 1st molar followed with placement of digital customized restoration using CEREC workflow in single sitting. This in turn will save time, is easy for non-compliance children, precise, and conservative approach to preserve grossly decayed young permanent molars. As discussed in various studies prefabricated crowns were available for endodontically treated permanent molars in children but customized and aesthetic restorative options were lacking. This approach is highly esthetic, and customized comfortable restorative approach that could be easily carried on young children chair side.

Conclusion

This case report suggests that CEREC chairside system is a useful tool for the clinician. The digital 3D impression, software design and milling unit in same office allow to produce highly aesthetic, customized and reliable restorations in a single visit, while improving patient acceptance and comfort for the procedures. We can assert that restorative treatment with digital CAD/CAM chairside workflow represents a valid alternative to rehabilitate pediatric patients, because it is a safe, predictable and personalized procedure but also it is easier, and faster than traditional protocol in long run.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

N B Pitts D T Zero P D Marsh K Ekstrand J A Weintraub F Ramos-Gomez Dental cariesNat Rev Dis Primers201731703010.1038/nrdp.2017.30

2 

World Health Organization. Oral Health. (accessed on 25 March 2020).https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/oral-health

3 

M Hamza A Chlyah B Bousfiha B Badre M Mtalsi H Saih Pathology And Abnormality Of The First Permanent Molar Among ChildrenHuman Teeth - Key Skills Clin Illustrations202210.5772/intechopen.89725

4 

RC Randall Preformed metal crowns for primary and permanent molar teeth: Review of the literaturePediatr Dent2002245489500

5 

NS Seale The use of stainless-steel crownsPediatr Dent20012455015

6 

DM Holsinger MH Wells M Scarbecz M Donaldson Clinical evaluation and parental satisfaction with pediatric zirconia anterior crownsPediatr Dent20163831927

7 

DJ Fasbinder Computerized technology for restorative dentistryAm J Dent201326311520

8 

SA Kindelan P Day UK national clinical guidelines in Pediatric Dentistry: stainless steel preformed crowns for primary molarsInt J Paediatr Dent200818120810.1111/j.1365-263X.2008.00935.x

9 

RC Randall Preformed metal crowns for primary and permanent molar teeth: review of the literaturePediatr Dent2000245489500

10 

NS Seale The use of stainless-steel crownsPediatr Dent20022455015

11 

T Joda U Brägger Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: A cost/time analysisClin Oral Implant Res201526121430510.1111/clr.12476

12 

H Simsek S Derelioglu In vitro comparative analysis of fracture resistance in inlay restoration prepared with CAD-CAM and different systems in the primary teethBiomed Res Int2016429276110.1155/2016/4292761

13 

T Joda U Brägger Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: A cost/time analysisClin Oral Implant Res201526121430510.1111/clr.12476

14 

M Dalstra B Melsen From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibilityJ Orthod20093613641



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 12-04-2022

Accepted : 04-05-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.ijce.2022.014


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 709

PDF Downloaded: 284