Introduction
The removal of bacteria from the root canal system and the avoidance of subsequent reinfection are the main goals of endodontic treatments. This is accomplished by first biomechanically cleansing the pulp area and then hermetically sealing it with an obturating substance.
Radix entomolaris (RE), as it was named by Carabelli, was the extra root found in the mandibular first molar for the first time. The incidence of this extra third root is least prevalent in the second molar and is typically found distolingually in the first, second, and third mandibular molars. The extra root on the mesiobuccal aspect is called radix paramolaris. Studies in the literature show that among populations of white Caucasians, Africans, Eurasians, and Indians, the prevalence of RE is less than 5%. Conversely, groups exhibiting Mongoloid characteristics, including the Chinese and the Eskimos, exhibit a higher frequency of 5–30%.1 Dentist must have knowledge about prevalence, morphology, diagnosis, canal configuration and the clinical approach required for such cases.2 Therefore, recognizing and addressing aberrant anatomy before and is essential to offering top-notch dental care throughout root canal therapy.3 The fact that the dentist did not completely remove all of the pulp tissue and bacteria is one of the primary causes of root canal therapy failure in molars. (Cohen & Brown 2002).4
Through a review of the literature, the current study seeks to characterize the internal and exterior morphology of RE as well as assess its prevalence, origin, and clinical behavior.5 Therefore, rigorous canal preparation and extremely accurate clinical and radiographic diagnostic techniques are required.6 The efficacy of endodontic treatment depends on the removal of germs from the rootcanal system and avoidance of re-infection.7 One of the reasons for partial obturation may be ignorance of the existence of the root canal's ramifications.8 Notice is therefore given that certain scientists have addressed issues connected to RE without having developed clear standards for identifying macrostructure.9 The clinical approach to diagnosis and endodontic treatment are also discussed and illustrated.10
Case Report
A 30-year-old patient came to the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics for the basic chief complaint of pain with respect to lower left back tooth region and with a non-contributory medical and dental history.
The pain was spontaneous, increased on lying down and present for last 3 days. Patient also experienced some sensitivity to hot foods in the tooth involved.
Deep carious lesion was observed and Tooth were tender on percussion#36.
Electric pulp test and heat test with a Gutta-percha stick gave a lingering response.
Radiolucency was seen in association with tooth #36.[Figure 1]
Upon complete clinical and radiographical examination, diagnosis of acute irreversible pulpitis was made.
It was decided to carry out endodontic treatment in mandibular first molar #36.
Access was gained to pulp chamber afteradministration of local anesthesia (2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline).Three orifices werelocated in first molar #36.
Mesiobuccal, mesiolingualand distal canals were identified. Search for second distal canal wasmade by further exploration of pulpal floor with a DG-16 endodontic explorer.
Access cavity was refined with endo access bur (Dentsply, Switzerland) and calculation of working length with the use of an electronic apex locator of Root ZX, J.Morita was done and was confirmed by radiography. [Figure 2 ]
Canals were cleaned and shaped using hand K files and ProTaper Next files (rotary) of Dentsply, Switzerland) with EDTA of concentration as 17%. Irrigation done with sodium hypochlorite 5% and achieved the patency in all the canals which was maintained with a 10#k-file (Mani, Japan). All the canals had separate portals of exit. Paper points were used to dry the canals, and gutta percha points were used for obturation utilizing the Cold lateral condensation technique and AH Plus sealant ( Dentsply, De Trey, Germany ).Radiograph is employed to evaluate the fit and placement of gutta-percha mastercone. [Figure 3]. Access cavity was filled with composite resin (tetric-N-ceram, ivoclarvivadent).
Discussion
The clinical triad: Three-dimensional obturation, appropriate chemomechanical preparation, and a proper diagnosis are essential for the successful root canal treatment. 1
Carlsen and Alexandersen categorized RE into 4 types: According to location of cervical portion.
Types A and B: 2 or 1 distal root (normal) component and the cervical part are present distally.
Type C: the mesially situated cervical region
Type AC: the center location of the cervical section lies between the mesial and distal root components. De Moor et al. divided RE into three categories:
Type 1: with a root canal or straight root
Type II: a straight root or root canal with a curving opening that first persists
Type III: has a first curve in the root canal's coronal third and a second curve that starts in middle and continues at apical third.
This classification is further modified by adding two more newly defined variants of RE termed.
Type 1: Small, where the length is half of that of the distobuccal root.
Type 2: Conical, where it is even smaller than the small type and has no root canal.2
Possible effort should be made on locating of any extra root in the mandibular 1st molars.3 Predictably , Following the fundamentals of access, cleaning and shaping , and also obturation of the whole of the root canal system is essential for a successful root canal procedure. Perhaps the most significant of the three is the principle of (straight) line access (Christie & Thompson 1994). For locating and proper access of the root canal, RE is situated distolingually, modifying the traditional triangle entrance cavity to a trapezoidal shape.4 Although many approaches utilized in knowing RE can be ascribed to the range of outcomes observed.5 Because the root canal wall of the RE was extremely thin, a straight path to these root canals is essential for proper shape and cleaning.6 Visual aids like a loupe, intraoral camera, or dental microscope can be useful.
Vertucci (1984) found that type 2 and type 4 lesions were more common in the mesial roots of mandibular molars, accounting for 28% and 51%, respectively. 70% of the distal roots are in type 1 canals. Type 1 root canal designs were found in 54% of distal roots, type 2 in 44%, and type 4 in 43% of mesial roots by Sert et al. (2004). In the current state, most mesial roots of the mandibular first molars had two canals (77%), and three canals in 20%.Most common were type 4 (55%) and type 2 (23%) in mesial roots7 Type 1 in 54% of distal roots, type 2 in 44% of mesial roots and type 4 in 43%. The majority of the mandibular first molars in this study had two canals in their mesial roots (77%), whereas 20% had three canals. In mesial roots, type 2 (23%) and type 4 (55%) were the most prevalent. 54% of distal roots are type 1.Therefore, when treating the mandibular first molar endodontically, it is crucial that the dentist always search for a fourth canal.8 The current study's findings concur with those of Vertucci (1984) and Sert et al. (2004).9 In order to prevent procedural errors, step-by-step procedures should be followed.10
Conclusion
Additionally, the potential of an other root needs to be carefully addressed and searched for. Correct alignment and interpretation of radiographs enable identifies chamber and anatomy of the root. Dentists must possess the necessary understanding of the morphology, etiology, prevalence and therapeutic approach to receive the best endodontic care.
Article
DOI
